Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Fair Value Measurements

v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurements
 6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value. We measure fair value based on authoritative accounting guidance, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands on required disclosures regarding fair value measurements.
Inputs are referred to as assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The uses of inputs in the valuation process are categorized into a three-level fair value hierarchy.
•
Level 1 — uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities we have the ability to access.
•
Level 2 — uses observable inputs other than quoted prices in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
•
Level 3 — uses one or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management judgment. 
Financial assets and liabilities with carrying amounts approximating fair value include cash, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The carrying amount of these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value because of their short maturities.  At September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, no assets or liabilities were valued using Level 3 criteria. 
Information about our long-term debt that is not measured at fair value is as follows:
 
September 30, 2015
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation Technique
Financial Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Long-term debt
$
101,250

 
$
101,250

 
$
108,000

 
$
108,000

 
Level 2 - Market Approach
Revolving credit facility
$
5,000

 
5,000

 
—

 
—

 
Level 2 - Market Approach
 
At September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the fair value of our variable rate term loan and revolving credit facility approximates its carrying value as we pay interest based on the current market rate. As the quoted price is only available for similar financial assets, the Company concluded the pricing is indirectly observable through dealers and has been classified as Level 2. 
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
We transact business in various foreign currencies and have established a program that primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risk associated with the effects of certain foreign currency exposures. Under this program, increases or decreases in our foreign currency exposures are intended to be offset by gains or losses on the forward contracts to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains or losses. These foreign currency exposures typically arise from intercompany transactions. Our forward contracts generally have terms of 30 days. We do not use forward contracts for trading purposes or designate these forward contracts as hedging instruments pursuant to ASC 815. We adjust the carrying amount of all contracts to their fair value at the end of each reporting period and unrealized gains and losses are included in our results of operations for that period. These gains and losses are designed to offset gains and losses resulting from settlement of payments received from our foreign operations which are settled in U.S. dollars. The fair value is determined by quoted prices from active foreign currency markets (Level 2 fair value).  The condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect unrealized gains within accounts receivable, net and unrealized losses within accrued liabilities. Our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to currency fluctuations will depend on the currency exchange rates and other factors in effect as the contracts mature. As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the notional amounts of forward contracts were as follows:
Notional amount of foreign currency forward contracts by currency
 
September 30, 2015
 
March 31, 2015
Russian Ruble
$
1,883

 
$
1,374

Euro
4,313

 
467

Canadian Dollar
228

 
243

South Korean Won
2,590

 
3,347

Mexican Peso
848

 
873

Australian Dollar
1,209

 
1,104

Japanese Yen
—

 
815

Brazilian Real
299

 
—

Total notional amounts
$
11,370

 
$
8,223


The following table represents the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts:
 
 
September 30, 2015
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
 
 
Assets
Liabilities
 
Assets
Liabilities
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
$
12

$
28

 
$
87

$
110


Foreign currency gains or losses related to our forward contracts in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) were losses of $241 and $208 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and losses of $660 and $175 for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Gains and losses from our forward contracts were offset by transaction gains or losses incurred with the settlement of transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Our net foreign currency losses were $96 and $784 in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, our net foreign currency losses were $257 and $769, respectively.
Interest Rate Swap
The Company entered into an interest rate swap contract to reduce the exposure to interest rate fluctuations associated with its variable rate term loan. Under the swap agreement we pay a fixed amount and receive or make payments based on a variable rate. The Company designated the interest rate swap contract as a cash flow hedge pursuant to ASC 815. The Company formally documents all relationships between the hedging instrument and hedged item, its risk management objective and strategy, as well as counterparty creditworthiness. At each reporting period our interest rate swap contract is adjusted to fair value based on dealer quotes, which consider forward yield curves and volatility levels (Level 2 fair value). Unrealized gains, representing derivative assets, are reported within accounts receivable, net and unrealized losses, representing derivative liabilities, are reported within accrued liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the fair value of the interest rate swap contract was an unrealized loss of $843 and $612, respectively. The change in fair value of the derivative instruments is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent the derivative instruments are deemed effective. Ineffectiveness is measured based on the changes in fair value of the interest rate swap contract and the change in fair value of the hypothetical derivative and is recognized in earnings in the period in which ineffectiveness is realized. Based on the criteria established by ASC 815, the interest rate swap contract is deemed to be highly effective. Any realized gains or losses resulting from the interest rate swap contract are recognized within interest expense. Gains and losses from our interest rate swap contract are offset by changes in the variable interest rate on our term loan. As of September 30, 2015, our interest rate on outstanding principal amounts was fixed at approximately 2.87%. We have hedged 100% of our interest payments on outstanding principal on our variable rate term loan through April 2016. For the period from May 1, 2016 through April 30, 2018, interest payments on approximately $5,200 of average outstanding principal remain unhedged as of September 30, 2015, increasing to $49,780 for the period from May 1, 2018 to April 19, 2019.
The following table summarizes the aggregate unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and the losses reclassified into earnings for the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax Expense (Benefit)
 
Other Comprehensive loss, net
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax Expense (Benefit)
 
Other Comprehensive loss, net
Unrealized loss at beginning of the period
$
(589
)
 
$
(206
)
 
$
(383
)
 
$
(525
)
 
$
(184
)
 
$
(341
)
Add: gain (loss) from change in fair value of cash flow hedge
(614
)
 
(215
)
 
(399
)
 
186

 
65

 
121

Less: loss reclassified into earnings from effective hedge
(236
)
 
(82
)
 
(154
)
 
(429
)
 
(150
)
 
(279
)
Less: ineffective portion of hedge transferred into earnings
(11
)
 
(4
)
 
(7
)
 
(17
)
 
(6
)
 
(11
)
Unrealized gain (loss) at end of the period
$
(956
)
 
$
(335
)
 
$
(621
)
 
$
107

 
$
37

 
$
70


 
Six Months Ended September 30, 2015
 
Six Months Ended September 30, 2014
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax Expense (Benefit)
 
Other Comprehensive loss, net
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax Expense (Benefit)
 
Other Comprehensive loss, net
Unrealized loss at beginning of the period
$
(746
)
 
$
(261
)
 
$
(485
)
 
$
(125
)
 
$
(44
)
 
$
(81
)
Add: gain (loss) from change in fair value of cash flow hedge
(720
)
 
(252
)
 
(468
)
 
(668
)
 
(234
)
 
(434
)
Less: loss reclassified into earnings from effective hedge
(488
)
 
(170
)
 
(318
)
 
(866
)
 
(303
)
 
(563
)
Less: ineffective portion of hedge transferred into earnings
(22
)
 
(8
)
 
(14
)
 
(34
)
 
(12
)
 
(22
)
Unrealized gain (loss) at end of the period
$
(956
)
 
$
(335
)
 
$
(621
)
 
$
107

 
$
37

 
$
70


Transfers out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
During the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no transfers out of accumulated other comprehensive loss except for realized losses from our interest rate swap contract presented in the preceding table, which were recorded within interest expense in our statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).