Related-Party Transactions |
12 Months Ended |
---|---|
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
Related-Party Transactions |
Related-Party Transactions
In connection with the Sumac transaction, one of the former principals retained 25% of the ownership of the Sumac business unit. This individual is employed by the Company and serves as general manager of the Sumac business unit. During fiscal 2017, this individual, together with the two other former principals of Sumac, who are not employed by the Company were paid $5,805 in the aggregate in full satisfaction of the Company's obligations under the $5,905 non-interest bearing performance-based note issued in connection with the Sumac transaction.
Since the acquisition by our former private equity sponsors that was completed on April 30, 2010, we have paid certain amounts to the Predecessor owners in settlement of CHS Transactions and have also received certain amounts that were identified as potential indemnity items at the time of the transaction. Certain members of our current management continue to be investors in the Predecessor ownership fund. Therefore, these payments made and received are considered to be related party transactions.
|
X | ||||||||||
- References No definition available.
|
X | ||||||||||
- Definition The entire disclosure for related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners; and (d) affiliates. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|